I listened to the oral arguments before the Supreme Court, Trump v. Anderson, on Thursday, February 8th. The Justices heard the two sides of the Colorado Supreme Court’s ballot decision. I do not have a law degree. I am, however, a college graduate, but that wasn’t sufficient to understand the arguments from the lawyer seeking to overturn the Colorado ballot decision. His argument was obtuse and to me, this indicates that the argument was weak and required a lot of scaffolding to hold itself up.
It's Okay. It is Only Insurrection.
It's Okay. It is Only Insurrection.
It's Okay. It is Only Insurrection.
I listened to the oral arguments before the Supreme Court, Trump v. Anderson, on Thursday, February 8th. The Justices heard the two sides of the Colorado Supreme Court’s ballot decision. I do not have a law degree. I am, however, a college graduate, but that wasn’t sufficient to understand the arguments from the lawyer seeking to overturn the Colorado ballot decision. His argument was obtuse and to me, this indicates that the argument was weak and required a lot of scaffolding to hold itself up.